Archive for the ‘Gregoire’ category

>Democrat State Rep. Hans Dunshee and the union pay-off bill.

April 4, 2009

>.
Hans Dunshee is a nice guy. He has his quirks, like when he reached over and voted another Representative’s vote the wrong way (You know… a GOP Rep’s vote? Back when they just used buttons instead of laptops?) and he’s all about his logger persona… big with flannel shirts.

But he’s also a die-hard democrat, with everything that means. And in this instance, what it means is that he wants to jack our taxes up in the midst of a horrific recession to do all he can to pay off his union buddies…. kind of an Obama-lite.

That it IS all about union pay back is based on the fact that it is union labor and union labor alone who’ll be used to build these school facilities, presuming this bond could pass.

“Union Labor” of course means “prevailing wage,” a bizarre concept that says that we, as tax payers, must pay absurd amounts of money for labor… absurd amounts of money that would reduce the amount of facilities build by 30% or so.

I will be a “no” on this sordid effort. Open this up to ANY construction company, union or no, and we can, perhaps, do some business. Otherwise, it’s just a scam to pay off unions.

And haven’t we had enough of that from the empty suit in the White House?


Washington lawmaker wants to send job-creating school-construction bond to voters

A House committee chairman wants to send voters a $3 billion bond measure that would pay for school construction.

Seattle Times staff reporter

OLYMPIA — A House committee chairman wants to send voters a $3 billion bond measure that would pay for school construction.

Rep. Hans Dunshee, D-Snohomish, chairman of the Capital Budget Committee, plans to unveil the proposal Monday.

Dunshee wouldn’t provide many details Friday, but said “this is what the governor and I have been talking about: Repair schools and create jobs.”

It wasn’t clear exactly how the bonds would be financed.

Last month, Gov. Chris Gregoire brought up the notion of a bond issue that would fund construction projects as a way to help stimulate the economy.

“I am interested in asking the people if they would consider a bond measure that … would allow us to potentially put people to work with projects out there like K-12 construction, or technology renovation or green renovation of our K-12 system,” Gregoire said at the time. “Something along the line where it’s real jobs on the ground.”

On Friday, the governor’s office said it hadn’t seen Dunshee’s proposal yet and had no comment, except that Gregoire likes the concept.

More:
.

>The mind-numbing idiocy of Washington State Government: Now issuing checks for ONE CENT.

March 4, 2009

>.

God help me, I just want to scream.

One.

Fricking.

Cent.

Will this kind of government waste and incompetence EVER end? One person has received, she claims, DOZENS of these checks.

What the hell is WRONG with my government?

>Governor "Last October we were operating in a surplus that didn’t exist" Gregoire: We’ll take stimulus money

February 24, 2009

>.
Recently, leftists and many in the media (Sorry, my bad… since the terms are interchangeable.) are attacking GOP governors with enough sense to at least question, if not refuse, some or all of the income redistribution that President Obama is so thrilled about; that the Congressional Budget Office says will harm our economy… because of an inescapable fact:

Idaho Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter was less optimistic. Otter, a Republican, has agreed to accept the stimulus money, but said he was concerned about expanding programs that could boost his state’s costs in the future when the federal dollars disappear.

Leftists in government are addicted to money. Like any hardcore junkie, democrats have no ability to look into the future.

From the president on down, democrats in government are genetically incapable of asking, or genetically incapable of caring about “what happens next?”

At some point, the money our grateful fiscal junkies are stealing from us will end. At some point, the Federal cow will dry up.

And then what?

Governor Gregoire, mouthing the DNC talking points that all shortsighted democrat governors are telling us, blathers thus:

“I’ll not only accept all the dollars coming to Washington state, but any governor who wants to reject the dollars, send ’em my way,” Gregoire said Monday after meeting with President Barack Obama at the White House.

There’s nothing in her quote… nothing in her mindless, short-sighted babble; that answers the question.

In the end, the hundreds of billions of dollars moronically stolen from us for this bizarre political payback/indebtedness program will stop… and who is going to pay for all the programs… the hope… the jobs… then?

Thanks a lot, governor. Just don’t come to me for your next fix.

Gregoire: We’ll take stimulus money
Monday, February 23 3:51 p.m.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Washington Governor Chris Gregoire. (File/The Columbian)

While some of her Republican colleagues try to decide whether to accept federal stimulus money, Democratic Gov. Chris Gregoire of Washington state says her mind is already made up.

“I’ll not only accept all the dollars coming to Washington state, but any governor who wants to reject the dollars, send ’em my way,” Gregoire said Monday after meeting with President Barack Obama at the White House.

“We’ve got an economy that is struggling right now,” Gregoire said. “These dollars represent hope. They represent jobs and services for people who can’t take care of themselves. We’re going to spend every dollar and we’re going to do it wisely.”

At Monday’s meeting, Obama told the nation’s governors that states could begin receiving money from the newly passed $787 billion economic stimulus program as soon as Wednesday.

Washington state could receive nearly $7 billion under the stimulus plan for projects ranging from transportation to food stamps to education. Oregon could get about $2 billion from the stimulus bill, Idaho and Alaska $1 billion each and more than $600 million for Montana. Much of the money will be designated for programs such as Medicaid and unemployment.

Obama warned against allowing politics to cloud discussion of the stimulus program and said governors must demonstrate that the stimulus money will be used to jump-start the ailing economy.

Message received, said Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer.

“People call this a stimulus bill. This is a jobs bill,” Schweitzer said. “It’s going to put people to work.”

Schweitzer, a Democrat, said the money could create or save as many as 11,000 jobs in Montana. The bill will be a huge boost for the Northwest energy sector, he added, noting that it includes billions of dollars for new transmission lines, coal gasification and weatherizing homes and businesses.

More:

>The People win a tremendous victory: Washington State wins lawsuit over union contracts

February 12, 2009

>.
There have been a few unions in that actually get it. Who can forget the local firefighter’s decision to at least temporarily fore go pay raises as a result of our doddering economy and reduced government revenues.

Others have been much more moronic in their political tonedeafness and their greed-at-all-cost approach to our state’s economic situation.

Among those more self-centered and selfish are the Washington Federation of State Employees. Cementing the idea into the hearts and minds of the people of this state (not to mention their rank and file, who, in the face of forced pay raises would suffer massive layoffs) that those who are SUPPOSED to serve US, instead believe that WE are SUPPOSED to serve THEM is a terrible strategy that is going to cost them in the long run.

Joining with the WFSE in the Gang of the Moron Four, are the SEIU and two of its locals, SEIU Local 1199 and SEIU 925.

These groups have a brain-damaged strategic view. It’s a nightmare for the rank and file to see their jobs put at risk in this economy over the issue of pay raises.

The question for the union worker is this: Is it better for SOME to get huge payraises? Or is it better to keep a job with NO pay raise?

Seems simple to me, but unions have never been about the worker as much as they’ve been about power and thuggery.

Adam Wilson

Wilson:
Adam Wilson Blog

Adam Wilson expounds on Washington state government, workers and politics. Wilson began covering those issues for the Olympian in 2004. He can be reached at: awilson@theolympian.com.

Judge: Gregoire errs, but union lawsuit falters (UPDATED)

• Published February 11, 2009

Gov. Chris Gregoire should have done things differently in negotiating with state employee unions, but her decision to cancel their contracts stands, said Thurston County Superior Court Judge Anne Hirsch.

Gregoire clearly muddied the process when she had her budget director serve both as negotiator and the person who later declared contracts for raises and health benefits financially unreasonable, the judge said today.

But the governor does have the power to back out of contracts after the Oct. 1 deadline to finish talks, Hirsch said, noting the law requires them to be certified by the budget office as feasible.

“The judge punted; we’re appealing; stand by,” said Greg Devereux, executive director of the Washington Federation of State Employees.

See background here.

UPDATE: Here’s an update from Glenn Kuper, of the Office of Financial Management:

It is important to note that the statute on collective bargaining establishes the Labor Relations Office in the Office of Financial Management (41.80.140) and also establishes that the OFM director certifies whether the contracts are financially feasible (41.80.010), so it is misleading to say the Governor “erred” in how she conducted the negotiation process. She simply followed what is dictated in law.

>Who kidnapped our Governor… and who did they replace her with: Gov calls for deportation of jailed illegal aliens

December 31, 2008

>First, she comes up with a budget that looks like Dino Rossi wrote it.

Then, she comes up with the idea of actually DEPORTING illegal aliens… jailed or otherwise?

It’s almost like someone kidnapped her and stuffed someone with common sense into a Gregoire Suit.


Gov calls for deportation of jailed illegal aliens

Local E-mail this Print this RSS
Last updated December 30, 2008 4:58 p.m. PT

By MANUEL VALDESASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

SEATTLE — To save money, Gov. Chris Gregoire wants illegal aliens serving time in state jails deported.

Her proposal estimates that deporting illegal aliens – who are serving or would serve time in state jails for drug or property crime convictions – will save the state more than $9 million in the next two-year budget.

The state faces a $5.7 billion budget deficit over the next 2 1/2 years, and Gregoire has proposed a no new-taxes budget proposal laden with cuts, including about $200 million from the Department of Corrections, the Attorney General’s office, and other public safety programs.

The deportation proposal is modeled after a program in Arizona that has saved the state more than $18.5 million since 2005, said Eldon Vail, Secretary of the state Department of Corrections.

“It’s not an ideal choice, if revenue was there, I’d say have them do their time,” Vail said. “Is justice better served? It’s a tough question to wrestle with when you don’t have resources.”

More:

>The Broken Clock Syndrome (III) – In our view Dec. 26: Ill-Timed Greed

December 28, 2008

>I may have mentioned on occasion my disdain for unions generally and the state employee unions particularly.

That disdain does not and never has extended to the rank and file.

But unions buy and sell politicians like I do tee-shirts. They take money from their members and use it to pay union salaries… and to support primarily democrats… particularly those democrats that widen, lengthen and deepen the public trough.

PAC 48’s involvement in our county’s recent election was purely an effort to buy a commissioner who they believed would do two things extremely important to local unions: build an unwanted, unneeded and massively expensive I-5 Bridge replacement loot rail portal; and to build an equally unwanted, unneeded and massively expensive megacasino where the developer guaranteed union support with his labor agreement. For me, these two particular landmarks of “screw-the-community” have helped cement the union concept of one of greed, political corruption and disdain for the communities that pay the bills.

An even more recent example is the unbridled greed of the United Auto Workers, who would rather see the Big Three go under then to even consider wage and benefit cuts to help this struggling industry survive to some level of profitability. True, the executives of the Big 3 took political tone-deafness to a level not seen since the first single digit popularity polls of our democrat-controlled Congress with their private jet arrivals to beg for billions. But that does not now excuse the UAW from acting responsibly while every effort is made to keep the American economy from going under.

And now, that economy and hundreds of thousands of people in this state are suffering pain. Genuine, every-waking-moment pain. We have a government that exists to serve US. And part of that painful reality is that this state’s Legislative budgets have skyrocketed since the advent of the collective-bargaining pay-back for the state-employee unions infesting us. Now is the tyime for a reality-check.

WE now face a budget deficit, warned of by Republicans in past legislatures, of $6 Billion.

Stunningly enough, Gov. Gregoire’s budget, on the surface at least; addresses this humongous fiscal hole primarily with cuts to various programs, pretty much across the board. I have some nigglies with her transportation projects locally (No, Governor, we do not need to waste $53 million on the St. John’s intersection, just like we didn’t need to waste $93 million on a bogus study with a pre-ordained outcome for the I-5 Bridge (Everyone alive knew 2 things: the entire purpose of this bizarre project is nothing more nor less than to get loot rail into the county and that the ONLY reason to replace the I-5 Bridge instead of building a 3rd Bridge is to accomplish that purpose… thus, negating the need, and the wasted expenditures… to take us to a place we all knew, ultimately we would achieve: The Downtown Mafia wants loot rail; they will waste absolutely any amount of OPM (Other People’s Money) to get it, and we will wind up with a new bridge, loot rail, and absolutely no improvement in congestion or freight mobility.)) but I am emboldened by her decision to provide no further waste for the bridge project.

That said, Gov. Gregoire seems to have shown at least a basic understanding of that most obvious of fiscal tenets: No society has ever taxed itself into prosperity. Most people get this.

State unions, showing a tone-deafness not out of place with Helen Keller, do not. They are actually suing the Governor to FORCE her to get them their pay raises.

This would be a PERFECT time to run a campaign to make Washington’s government union free. We could stand as a shining light to every OTHER state who will not allow their unions, who, after all, are there to serve the people; to engage in political extortion at the expense of the millions forced to finance their greed and avarice.

Sue and be damned, I say. The question is this: will the Governor cave to these people like she did the Tribes, since she owes them at least as much of a political debt? Is the budget eyewash? Or does she mean it? Time will tell.

The Columbian deserves some credit for stating the obvious in this editorial, even if a few days late.. The leftists that commented under the editorial show a basic inability to understand either the role of state employee unions or our role as taxpayers in funding their efforts. Some write as if we face no fiscal difficulty of any kind, and therefore the unions shouldn’t “suffer.”

Of course they should. At a time when all are in pain, government employees deserve no special cache’ in pain avoidance. When the people suffer… they must suffer as well.

To believe otherwise is to show a level of ignorance and cluelessness that would astound even the most casual observer, and the unions and the idjits commenting on the Columbian editorial addressing this matter manage to pull it off brilliantly.

But cluelessness is an essential element of becoming a leftist… or one would avoid that particular malady.


Editorials
In our view Dec. 26: Ill-Timed Greed
Message from state workers’ union: ‘Give us our money; never mind your problems
Friday, December 26 1:00 a.m.

Labor unions have improved the American way of life in many ways for more than 130 years. Working conditions, wages and benefits all are better because of unions.

But in a modern America, sooner or later unions must decide to become part of the solution or continue to be part of the problem. To date, the latter seems to be the case, as evidenced in this state by the Washington Federation of State Employees suing Gov. Chris Gregoire on Tuesday. In the budget that Gregoire released last week, she proposed dropping raises of about 2 percent for the union’s 40,000 workers in state agencies and colleges.

In so doing, Gregoire essentially declared that times are tough for everyone, including union workers. That’s not persuasive enough for union officials. Their lawsuit accuses Gregoire of unfair labor practices. How can that be, when Gregoire wants union workers to be treated like everyone else? Everyone else, that is, lucky enough to have a job.

She’s also accused of breach of contract, an argument that loses steam when union spokesman Tim Welch says his group simply wants the issue taken to the Legislature. “If they vote it down, then we go back to negotiations. We don’t understand why the governor couldn’t do that,” he said.

The union is looking for kinder treatment from legislators than they’re receiving from Gregoire. She promised not to raise taxes, and she kept that promise, by proposing tough cuts in programs, salaries and virtually all other aspects of state government.

When union officials squawk about pay during the worst economic crisis in memory, it only fuels the suspicion that all they care about is the union. They can attach euphemistic words to their title (the teachers union is the Washington Education Association) but repeatedly union leaders and members embrace their selfish sole priority. That’s their job, of course, but it does nothing to solve the economic problem.

State workers are being laid off left and right. A hiring freeze has been imposed, to the detriment of many citizens who rely on vital state agencies and services. Overall, Gregoire has proposed more than $3 billion in spending cuts over the next 2 years. More than 2,000 state workers could be laid off. Classrooms likely will become more crowded. Highway projects will be postponed. Yet what do we hear from the state employees’ union? “Give us our money. Never mind your problems.”

More:

>State union thugs: now SUING the Gov for their pay raises.

December 24, 2008

>.
The people of this country generally and this state particularly are hurting. We’re hurting big time in a wide variety of areas. On December 18th, I wrote about Gov. Gregoire’s stunning effort to balance the budget without raising taxes, and mentioned my belief that the unions don’t give a damn about anyone but themselves.

So, what do the union scum do?

They sue the Governor. Here’s the Seattle Times’ take on it… and here’s the PI’s effort.

These selfish clowns are actually suing the Governor as outlined here:

The lawsuit asks Thurston County Superior Court to compel the governor to submit a request to the Legislature to fund the pay raises and other economic parts of the five contracts negotiated by the Federation. The pacts cover 30,000 General Government workers and 10,000 employees at 12 community colleges and all four-year universities and The Evergreen State College.

“Pay raise?” They need to be forced to take a substantial PAY CUT. Or do they find the idea of unemployment intriguing?

Apparently, these thugs, including those employed at our universities, lack the ability to grasp the impacts of our troubled economy.

Or, alternately, they simply don’t care because they’re greedy pigs.

Remember the good old days, before the dems paid these scum off with collective bargaining?

Were it up to me, I’d fire off a bill to decertify the state employee unions. I would hammer them like nails, since they clearly don’t give a damn about those they allegedly serve…. that is, us.
.

>Gregoire throws "No-Choice Royce" a bone: A few bucks for the waterfront, but nothing for his light rail project.

December 19, 2008

>.

It’s bizarre and ironic that Royce Pollard would waste $4 Billion to get a $700 million dollar, “camel’s-nose-under-the-tent-flap” light rail project that nobody wants, but that’s the cold, harsh, reality confronting us all today.

For whatever the reason, the Mayor of America’s Vancouver would saddle each resident of Clark County with an equivalent tax debt of $10,000 or so each, so that the brochures for this thriving metropolis could have a picture of a light rail train on the cover; in this instance, a train unable to move because of weather.

The plan is to replace a bridge that does not need replacing, and then to charge the 60,000 or so people that need both the I-5 and I-205 bridges to go to work only an additional $100 or so per month for the privilege, all to get light rail in here.

This plan will do absolutely nothing to address congestion; Portland’s congestion issues even with their massive, over-budget and criminal-laden light rail system is legendary and worse then Seattle’s, which acknowledges that a completed, multi-billion dollar waste of money known as light rail will do nothing to reduce congestion. Nor will it have any impact on freight mobility, the only other justified reason to expend transportation dollars outside of safety… and no one has shown where the I-5 bridge is unsafe, or certainly unsafe to the point where it needs to be replaced as opposed to repaired or retro-fitted.

No, in the minds of the Downtown Mafia, the bridge has to go in favor of something light rail compatible. Never mind that we’re in an economic meltdown or that officials everywhere have been told their isn’t any money for this. They keep chugging away, wasting $10’s of millions for planning that could go elsewhere and actually make a difference besides in consultant’s Porsche payments; all for a bridge that will never get built.

Yesterday, the Governor released a budget that will hopefully drive a stake through the heart of this waste monster… for in the budget was absolutely not one dime for the bridge, if our erstwhile bridge/light rail, cheerleaders, aka the Columbian, are to be believed.

Hopefully, between the lack of cash and the new GOP majority on the county commission, we can bury this steaming pile of waste once and for all… and start looking at 3rd bridge possibilities that reflect the changing demographic of our county.


Plan includes money for waterfront but not bridge
Thursday, December 18 9:27 p.m.

BY JEFFREY MIZE
COLUMBIAN STAFF WRITER

Gov. Chris Gregoire’s proposed budget includes money for the Columbia River waterfront and a state Highway 500 interchange, but nothing for a new Interstate 5 bridge.

“We assume it continues, but we don’t have additional dollars to fund it,” Gregoire said about the Columbia River Crossing during a conference call with The Columbian Thursday.

Gregoire, a Democrat who begins her second four-year term next month, promised three months ago to include $3.1 million in her budget for infrastructure improvements to open up the former 32-acre Boise Cascade site.

Gregoire said she put that amount in her capital budget for the coming biennium, money the city of Vancouver could use to support a large-scale project that could attract $1.2 billion in private investment and generate millions in tax receipts for state and local governments.

The city has identified $38.6 million in rail, road and utility improvements and pledged $15.5 million to the project. Developers have agreed to chip in $8 million, and state lawmakers already approved $910,000.

More:

Now, chances that the waterfront project will attract $1.2 billion worth of anything are only exceeded by chances of common sense prevailing at both city hall and the newspaper; in short, zero.

The city’s moronic tax structure; their strong arm tactics on local projects, their wasteful spending on subsidizing the Hilton for millions of taxpayer dollars (so far) with millions of taxpayer dollars to go; their head tax and all the nonsense that goes with it… all of that combine to give pause to anyone investing in the new and improved (but still largely vacant) slum that is downtown Vancouver, the Soviet Socialist Republic of Southwest Washington.

The only bone I have to pick with the Governor’s budget is the waste of $52 million on an unneeded (compared to, say, the 134th Ave debacle in Salmon Creek, which didn’t seem to get any money, or none that was mentioned, at least) new SR 500 interchange at St. Johns.

We’re still looking to make up for the wasted time during the OTHER $50 million blown on the VanMall and Andresen interchanges; unneeded, unwanted and unnecessary to those of us who use them every day… just like we used them every day BEFORE they were tore up and replaced with feats of engineering instead of traffic light coordination.

But all in all, I’ll settle for this over the massive, colossal and unnecessary waste advocated by the downtowners in favor of their massive boondoggle known as the I-5 Bridge replacement.
.

>But not by me: Frugal state budget hated by almost everybody

December 19, 2008

>.
I’ve publicly stated in the past, though not on this blog, that there was no way that Gov. Gregoire would not raise our taxes to balance the gapping maw of a budget deficit.

I stand corrected.

Our taxes will definitely be raised, because as this article points out, many (and unions in particular) are incapable of understand that our economy is a shambles. They could care less that thousands are becoming unemployed every week… they want what they want, no matter how badly the rest of us have to suffer for them to get it.

Unions don’t give a damn about anyone or anything but themselves. If they did, there would at least be a spirit of compromise… a pragmatic understanding that our entire state is suffering, and as public servants, unions have to share in that pain.

I have yet to see anything that indicates they get it.

The question I have is this: Is this budget political eyewash?

Gov. Gregoire HAS the ability to make sure that this budget, substantially unaltered, becomes the financial plan for this state.

All she has to do is hold a press conference tomorrow and tell the world the following:

“I will veto any budget that doesn’t closely match my proposals.”

If she FAILS to do that… and soon… then we’ll know that this effort was eyewash.

We’ll keep a close watch on her. Will she get testicular on Frank and Lisa’s buttocks?

Frugal state budget hated by almost everybody

By CHRIS McGANN
P-I CAPITOL CORRESPONDENT

OLYMPIA — Unacceptable.

That’s what advocates for education, health and social programs called the $3 billion in cuts Gov. Chris Gregoire proposes in a no-new taxes plan for bridging a $5.8 billion budget shortfall.

“For low income individuals and families, this is sort of the nightmare before Christmas,” said human services lobbyist Nick Federici. “The elimination of the General Assistance- Unemployable program, which is financial assistance for the lowest of the low income — along with their mental health and health care benefits, elimination of a substantial portion of the basic health plan, cutting housing assistance by one half — I think this is going to be devastating for not just the low income but working families that rely on a lot of these type of programs particularly in these tough economic times.”

The criticism of Gregoire’s budget comes as no surprise. Gregoire said of her own budget: “I hate it …Nothing went untouched, and I’ve told people whom I respect and admire and who have folks that are going to be dramatically by this budget, ‘You’re going to hate it.’ I’ve told Legislators, ‘You are going to hate my budget. There’s something in there for everybody not to like.'”

More:
.